S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37 § 37.10A
Misdemeanors and Other Enforcement Provisions (San Francisco Rent Ordinance)
Operative Text
(a) It shall be unlawful for a landlord to increase rent or rents in violation of the decision
of an Administrative Law Judge or the decision of the board on appeal pursuant to the hearing
and appeal procedures set forth in Section 37.8 of this chapter. It shall further be unlawful for a
landlord to charge any rent which exceeds the limitations of this chapter. Any person who
increases rents in violation of such decisions or who charges excessive rents shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
(b) It shall be unlawful for a landlord to refuse to rent or lease or otherwise deny to or
withhold from any person any rental unit because the age of a prospective tenant would result in
the tenant acquiring rights under this Chapter. Any person who refuses to rent in violation of this
subsection shall, in addition to any other penalties provided by state or federal law, be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
(c) It shall be unlawful for a landlord or for any person who willfully assists a landlord to
recover possession of a rental unit unless, prior to recovery of possession of the unit the landlord
satisfies all requirements for recovery of the unit under Section 37.9(a) or (b).
(d) In any criminal or civil proceeding based on a violation of Section 37.10A(c), the
landlord's failure to use a recovered unit for the Section 37.9(a) or (b) ground stated verbally or
in writing to the tenant from whom the unit was recovered shall give rise to a presumption that
the landlord did not have a good faith intention to recover the unit for the stated ground.
(e) If possession of a rental unit is recovered as the result of any written or verbal
statement to the tenant that the landlord intends to recover the unit under one of the grounds
enumerated in Section 37.9(a) or (b), the unit shall be subject to all restrictions set forth under
this Chapter on units recovered for such stated purpose regardless of any agreement made
between the landlord or the landlord's agent and the tenant who vacated the recovered unit.
Any unit vacated by a tenant within 120 days after receiving any written or verbal statement from
the landlord stating that the landlord intends to recover the unit under Section 37.9(a) or (b),
shall be rebuttably presumed to have been recovered by the landlord pursuant to the grounds
identified in that written or verbal statement.
(f) It shall be unlawful for a landlord to knowingly fail to disclose in writing to the buyer,
prior to entering into a contract for the sale of any property consisting of two or more residential
units, the specific legal ground(s) for the termination of the tenancy of each residential unit to be
delivered vacant at the close of escrow.
(g) It shall be unlawful for a landlord/owner, when offering a property for sale in the City
and County of San Francisco that includes two or more residential units, to knowingly fail to
disclose in writing to any prospective purchaser:
(1) The specific legal ground(s) for the termination of the tenancy of each
residential unit to be delivered vacant at the close of escrow; and,
(2) Whether the unit was occupied by an elderly or disabled tenant at the time the
tenancy was terminated. For purposes of this Section 37.10A(g), "elderly" means a tenant
defined as elderly by Administrative Code Sections 37.9(i)(1)(A), 37.9A(e)(1)(C), 37.9A(e)(2)(D),
or 37.9A(e)(3)(C), or a tenant defined as "senior" by Subdivision Code Section 1359(d). For
purposes of this Section 37.10A(g), "disabled" means a tenant defined as disabled by
Administrative Code Sections 37.9(i)(1)(B)(i), 37.9A(e)(1)(C), 37.9A(e)(2)(D), or 37.9A(e)(3)(C),
or by Subdivision Code Section 1359(d).
Any disclosure required by this Subsection (g) that is made on a flier or other
document describing the property which is made available to prospective purchasers at each
open house and at any tour through the property will constitute compliance with the disclosure
requirements of this Subsection (g).
(h) It shall be unlawful for any landlord, within five years after service of the notice to quit
under Section 37.9(a)(8), to charge a rent for the unit that exceeds the maximum rent for the unit
as provided in Section 37.9B(a), unless the notice of constraints on the unit has been rescinded.
Each month or portion thereof that the landlord charges an excessive rent in violation of Section
37.9B(a) shall constitute a separate violation.
(i) It shall be unlawful for a landlord to endeavor to recover possession of a rental unit
that is exempt from rent increase limitations under Section 37.3(d) or Section 37.3(g) by means
of a rent increase that is imposed in bad faith with an intent to defraud, intimidate, or coerce the
tenant into vacating the rental unit in circumvention of Section 37.9(a), 37.9A, 37.9B, or 37.9C.
Evidence of bad faith may include but is not limited to the following: (1) the rent increase was
substantially in excess of market rates for comparable units; (2) the rent increase was within six
months after an attempt to recover possession of the unit; and (3) such other factors as a court
or the Rent Board may deem relevant.
(j) Any person who violates Section 37.10A(a),(b),(c), (f), or (h) is guilty of a
misdemeanor and shall be punished by a mandatory fine of $1,000.00, and in addition to such
fine may be punished by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period of not more than six
months. Each violation shall constitute a separate offense.San Francisco Administrative Code § 37.10A establishes a range of unlawful acts for landlords, including charging rent above board-approved limits, discriminating against prospective tenants based on age-related rent-control rights, recovering possession of a unit without meeting the legal grounds under § 37.9(a) or (b), and failing to disclose tenancy-termination grounds when selling multi-unit properties. Certain violations—such as excessive rent charges, age-based rental refusals, and improper evictions—carry misdemeanor penalties including a mandatory $1,000 fine and potential jail time of up to six months, with each month of a continuing violation counted separately. The provision also creates legal presumptions that can be used in civil or criminal proceedings when a landlord's subsequent conduct is inconsistent with the stated reason for recovering a unit.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 37.10A, compliant operators ensure that any rent charged stays within board-approved limits and that no tenant is turned away because their age would trigger rent-control protections. When recovering a unit under § 37.9(a) or (b), operators document and follow through on the stated grounds, since failure to use the unit for that purpose can create a legal presumption of bad faith in subsequent proceedings. Sellers of properties with two or more residential units generally provide written disclosure of the legal grounds for each vacant unit and whether any displaced tenant was elderly or disabled.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
§ 37.10A gives tenants a basis to challenge overcharges, age-based rental denials, and wrongful evictions as misdemeanor violations carrying mandatory fines. If a landlord vacates a unit under a stated § 37.9(a) or (b) ground but then uses it differently, that inconsistency can create a legal presumption in civil or criminal proceedings that the stated reason was not genuine. Tenants who believe a violation has occurred may file a complaint with the San Francisco Rent Board or consult a tenant-rights organization to understand available enforcement paths.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 4, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.