S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37 § 37.10B
Tenant Harassment (San Francisco Rent Ordinance)
Operative Text
(a) No landlord, and no agent, contractor, subcontractor or employee of the landlord
shall do any of the following in bad faith:
(1) Interrupt, terminate or fail to provide housing services required by contract or
by State, County or local housing, health or safety laws;
(2) Fail to perform repairs and maintenance required by contract or by State,
County or local housing, health or safety laws;
(3) Fail to exercise due diligence in completing repairs and maintenance once
undertaken or fail to follow appropriate industry repair, containment or remediation protocols
designed to minimize exposure to noise, dust, lead, paint, mold, asbestos, or other building
materials with potentially harmful health impacts;
(4) Abuse the landlord’s right of access into a rental housing unit as that right is
provided by law;
(5) Influence or attempt to influence a tenant to vacate a rental housing unit
through fraud, intimidation or coercion; for example and without limitation, by endeavoring to
recover possession of a rental unit that is exempt from rent increase limitations under Section
37.3(d) or Section 37.3(g) by means of a rent increase that is imposed with an intent to defraud,
intimidate, or coerce the tenant into vacating the rental unit in circumvention of Section 37.9(a),
37.9A, 37.9B, or 37.9C, in which case evidence of bad faith may include but is not limited to the
following: (1) the rent increase was substantially in excess of market rates for comparable units;
(2) the rent increase was within six months after an attempt to recover possession of the unit;
and (3) such other factors as a court or the Rent Board may deem relevant;
(6) Attempt to coerce the tenant to vacate with offer(s) of payments to vacate
which are accompanied with threats or intimidation;
(7) Continue to offer payments to vacate after tenant has notified the landlord in
writing that they no longer wish to receive further offers of payments to vacate;
(8) Threaten the tenant, by word or gesture, with physical harm;
(9) Violate any law which prohibits discrimination based on actual or perceived
race, gender, sexual preference, sexual orientation, ethnic background, nationality, place of
birth, immigration or citizenship status, religion, age, parenthood, marriage, pregnancy, disability,
AIDS or occupancy by a minor child;
(10) Interfere with a tenant’s right to quiet use and enjoyment of a rental housing
unit as that right is defined by California law;
(11) Refuse to accept or acknowledge receipt of a tenant’s lawful rent payment;
(12) Refuse to cash a rent check for over 30 days;
(13) Interfere with a tenant’s right to privacy;
(14) Request information that violates a tenant’s right to privacy, including but not
limited to residence or citizenship status or social security number;
(15) Other repeated acts or omissions of such significance as to substantially
interfere with or disturb the comfort, repose, peace or quiet of any person lawfully entitled to
occupancy of such dwelling unit and that cause, are likely to cause, or are intended to cause any
person lawfully entitled to occupancy of a dwelling unit to vacate such dwelling unit or to
surrender or waive any rights in relation to such occupancy.
(b) Nothing in this Section 37.10B shall be construed as to prevent the lawful eviction of
a tenant by appropriate legal means.
(c) Enforcement and penalties.
(1) Rent Board. Violation of Sections 37.10B(a)(1) – (3) is a substantial and
significant decrease in services as defined in Section 37.2(g) and tenants may file a petition with
the Rent Board for a reduction in rent.
(2) Criminal Penalty. Any person who is convicted of violating this Section shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not greater than
one thousand dollars or by imprisonment in the County Jail for not more than six months, or by
both such fine and imprisonment.
(3) Civil Action. Any person, including the City, may enforce the provisions of this
Section by means of a civil action. The burden of proof in such cases shall be preponderance of
the evidence. A violation of this Chapter may be asserted as an affirmative defense in an
unlawful detainer action.
(4) Injunction. Any person who commits an act, proposes to commit an act, or
engages in any pattern and practice which violates this Section 37.10B may be enjoined
therefrom by any court of competent jurisdiction. An action for injunction under this subsection
may be brought by an aggrieved person, by the City Attorney, or by any person or entity who will
fairly and adequately represent the interest of the protected class.
(5) Penalties and Other Monetary Awards. Any person who violates or aids or
incites another person to violate the provisions of this Section is liable for each and every such
offense for money damages of not less than three times actual damages suffered by an
aggrieved party (including damages for mental or emotional distress), or for statutory damages
in the sum of one thousand dollars, whichever is greater, and whatever other relief the court
deems appropriate. In the case of an award of damages for mental or emotional distress, said
award shall only be trebled if the trier of fact finds that the landlord acted in knowing violation of
or in reckless disregard of Section 37.9, 37.10A, or 37.10B herein. In addition, a prevailing
plaintiff shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to order of the court.
The trier of fact may also award punitive damages to any plaintiff, including the City, in a proper
case as defined by Civil Code Section 3294. The remedies available under this Section shall be
in addition to any other existing remedies which may be available to the tenant or the City.
(6) Defending Eviction Lawsuits. In any action to recover possession of a rental
unit subject to the Chapter, unless the sole basis of the notice to quit is Section 37.9(b), the court
shall award the tenant reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in defending the action upon
a finding that the tenant is the prevailing party under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1032(a)(4).
(d) Severability. If any provision or clause of this Section 37.10B, or Section 37.2(g), or
the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional or to be
otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions of this Section 37.10B or Section 37.2(g) and all clauses of these Sections are
declared to be severable.
[Sec. 37.11: amended by Ord. No. 339-80, effective August 2, 1980; Ord. No. 362-80,
effective September 6, 1980; repealed by Ord. No. 20-84, effective February 18, 1984]San Francisco Administrative Code § 37.10B prohibits landlords and their agents from engaging in a broad range of bad-faith conduct toward tenants, including disrupting housing services, neglecting repairs, abusing access rights, using fraud or intimidation to pressure tenants to leave, threatening physical harm, discriminating, or repeatedly disturbing a tenant's quiet enjoyment. The provision covers both acts and omissions, and it applies to agents, contractors, and employees acting on the landlord's behalf. Enforcement paths include Rent Board petitions, civil lawsuits, injunctions, and criminal misdemeanor charges, with potential remedies ranging from rent reductions to treble damages and attorney's fees.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 37.10B, compliant operators maintain required housing services and complete repairs diligently, follow industry-standard remediation protocols, and limit unit access to what the law permits. They avoid any conduct—whether direct threats, persistent buyout offers after a written refusal, or discriminatory treatment—that could be construed as bad-faith pressure on a tenant to vacate. Because violations can expose a landlord to treble damages, attorney's fees, and criminal penalties, property managers generally document their maintenance practices and communications carefully.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 37.10B gives tenants protection against a wide range of landlord conduct, from neglected repairs and privacy violations to intimidation and discriminatory treatment. Tenants whose housing services are reduced under subsections (a)(1)–(3) may file a petition with the San Francisco Rent Board for a rent reduction, while other violations can be pursued through a civil lawsuit or raised as an affirmative defense in an eviction proceeding. Tenant-rights organizations in San Francisco can help residents understand which enforcement path under § 37.10B may apply to their situation.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 4, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.