S.F. Admin. Code ch. 37 § 37.8A
Expedited Hearing Procedures (San Francisco Rent Ordinance)
Operative Text
As an alternative to the hearing procedures set forth in Sections 37.7 (g) and 37.8 (e) above, a landlord or tenant may, in certain cases, obtain an expedited hearing and final order with the written consent of all parties. This Section contains the exclusive grounds and procedures for such hearings. (a) Applicability. A tenant or landlord may seek an expedited hearing for the following petitions only: (1) Any landlord capital improvement petition where the proposed increase for certified capital improvement costs does not exceed the greater of 10 percent or $30 of a tenant's base rent and the parties stipulate to the cost of the capital improvements; (2) Any tenant petition alleging decreased housing services with a past value not exceeding $1,000 as of the date the petition is filed; (3) Any tenant petition alleging the landlord's failure to repair and maintain the premises as required by state or local law; (4) Any tenant petition alleging unlawful rent increases where the parties stipulate to the tenant's rent history and the rent overpayments do not exceed a total of $1,000 as of the date the petition is filed; (5) Any petition concerning jurisdictional questions where the parties stipulate to the relevant facts. (b) Hearing Procedures. The petition application procedures of Section 37.7 (f) and Section 37.8 (c) and (d) apply to petitions for expedited hearings. The hearings shall be conducted according to the following procedures: (1) Time of Hearing. The hearing must be held within 21 days of the filing of the written consent of all the parties. The level of housing services provided to tenants' rental units shall not be decreased during the period between the filing of the petition and the conclusion of the hearing. (2) Consolidation. To the greatest extent possible, and only with the consent of the parties, hearings with respect to a given building shall be consolidated. (3) Conduct of Hearing. The hearing shall be conducted by an Administrative Law Judge designated by the Board. Both parties may offer such documents, testimony, written declarations or other evidence as may be pertinent to the proceedings. Stipulations of the parties as required under Section 37.8A (b)(1), (b)(4) and (b)(5) shall be required as evidence. Burden of proof requirements set forth in Sections 37.7 and 37.8 are applicable to the hearing categories in Section 37.8A (b) above. No record of the hearing shall be maintained for any purpose. (4) Order of the Administrative Law Judge. Based upon all criteria set forth in Sections 37.7 (4) and 37.8 (e)(4) governing the petition, the Administrative Law Judge shall make a written order no later than 10 days after the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge shall make no findings of fact. The Administrative Law Judge shall order payment or refund of amounts owing to a party or parties, if amounts are owed, within a period of time not to exceed 45 days. (5) Stay of Order. The Administrative Law Judge's order shall be stayed for 15 days from the date of issuance. During this period, either party may lodge a written objection to the order with the Board. If the Board receives such objection within this period, the order is automatically dissolved and the petitioning party may refile the petition for hearing under any other appropriate hearing procedure set forth in this chapter. (6) Finality of Administrative Law Judge's Order. If no objection to the Administrative Law Judge's order is made pursuant to Subsection (c)(5) above, the order becomes final. The order is not subject to appeal to the Board under Section 37.8 (f) nor is it subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 37.8 (f)(9).
Section 37.8A of the San Francisco Administrative Code establishes an optional fast-track hearing process within the Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board's system, available when all parties agree in writing. It applies to a defined, limited set of disputes—such as smaller capital improvement petitions, decreased housing services claims under $1,000, failure-to-maintain allegations, and unlawful rent increases under $1,000—and produces a binding written order within roughly 10 days of the hearing. That order becomes final if neither party files a written objection within 15 days, and unlike standard proceedings, it cannot be appealed to the Board or reviewed by a court.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under S.F. Admin. Code § 37.8A, landlords pursuing qualifying capital improvement petitions—where the proposed increase does not exceed the greater of 10% or $30 of a tenant's base rent and costs are stipulated—may use the expedited process to reach a final order faster than standard procedures allow. A compliant operator ensures that housing services are not reduced between the petition filing and the conclusion of the hearing, as required by § 37.8A(b)(1). Landlords should be aware that while the expedited path is quicker, the resulting order is not appealable to the Board and carries no findings of fact, making the initial stipulations and evidence presented at the hearing especially significant.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 37.8A gives tenants the option to pursue an expedited hearing for certain petitions—including decreased housing services claims, failure-to-repair allegations, and unlawful rent increase claims under $1,000—provided all parties consent in writing. The hearing must be scheduled within 21 days of that consent, and a written order must follow within 10 days of the hearing, offering a faster resolution than standard Board procedures. Tenants who receive an order they disagree with have a 15-day window to file a written objection with the San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board, which automatically dissolves the order and allows the petition to be refiled under a different hearing procedure; tenant-rights organizations can help explain what that process involves.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 15, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
Rules and statutes cited by this regulation
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API