San Jose Mun. Code Chapter 17.23 § 17.23.830
Adjustment of base year net operating income (San Jose Apartment Rent Ordinance and Tenant Protection Ordinance)
Operative Text
A. Presumption of Fair Return. The Apartment Rent Ordinance presumes that the Landlord received a fair return in the Base Year. B. Rebutting the Presumption. The presumption that the Landlord received a fair return in the Base Year based on reasonable expenses may be overcome by sufficient evidence showing that income was unusually low or expenses were unusually high for a particular Covered Property in the Base Year as described in this Part. C. Authority to Adjust Net Operating Income. The Hearing Officer may adjust the Base Year Net Operating Income if the Hearing Officer finds: 1. The Landlord's Operating Expenses in the Base Year were unusually high or low in comparison to other years due to unusual circumstances. In such instances, adjustments may be made in calculating Operating Expenses so the Base Year Operating Expenses reflect average expenses for the Covered Property over a reasonable period of time. The Hearing Officer shall consider the following factors in making this finding: a. The Landlord made substantial Capital Improvements during the Base Year, which were not reflected in the Base Year rents; b. Substantial repairs exceeding one (1%) of the annual Rent (as determined pursuant to Section 17.23.820.A.1) were made due to damage caused by uninsured disaster or vandalism, provided that the property was not uninsured or unreasonably underinsured as determined by the Hearing Officer, which were not reflected in the Base Year rents; c. Maintenance and repair were below accepted standards or resulted from the unreasonable deferral of other repairs or work; d. Other expenses were unreasonably high or low, notwithstanding prudent business practice. 2. The Landlord's Gross Income during the Base Year was unusually high or low. In such instances, adjustments may be made in calculating Gross Income consistent with the purposes of this Chapter. The Hearing Officer shall consider the following factors in making this finding: a. The Gross Income during the Base Year was unusually low because some Tenants had unusually low Rents for the quality, location, age, amenities and condition of the housing as compared to the Rent for comparable units without housing violations in the immediate area in which the Rent Stabilized Unit is located. In the event that a claim is made pursuant to this Section, the Landlord shall pay for an appraisal of Base Year rents for comparable buildings made by an appraiser selected by the City. The appraisal, which shall be presented as evidence, shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the standards in the Regulations. b. The Gross Income during the Base Year was significantly lower than normal because of destruction of all or part of the premises and/or temporary eviction for construction or repairs; c. There was a special relationship between the Landlord and Tenant (such as a family relationship) resulting in abnormally low rent charges; d. The Rents had not been increased for five (5) years preceding the Base Year; e. The Tenant lawfully assumed maintenance responsibilities in exchange for low Rent increases or no Rent increases; or f. Other special circumstances which establish that the Rent was not set as the result of an arms-length transaction.
San Jose Municipal Code § 17.23.830 establishes that a landlord is presumed to have received a fair return during the base year, but that presumption can be challenged with evidence of unusually high expenses or unusually low income. A Hearing Officer has authority to adjust the base year net operating income if circumstances like abnormal capital improvements, uninsured disaster repairs, deferred maintenance, or non-arms-length rental arrangements skewed the base year figures. The adjustment process is designed to produce a base year income figure that more accurately reflects typical operating conditions for the property.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 17.23.830, operators who believe their base year figures were distorted by unusual expenses or atypically low rents can present evidence to a Hearing Officer to rebut the fair-return presumption. Compliant operators generally document capital improvements, repair costs, and any special tenant relationships from the base year so that records are available if a petition proceeds to hearing. Note that if a landlord claims unusually low base year rents, the ordinance requires the landlord to fund a city-selected appraisal of comparable rents.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 17.23.830 is relevant to tenants because a landlord's petition for a rent increase may hinge on an adjusted base year net operating income figure. Tenants involved in a hearing can examine whether the landlord's claimed adjustments—such as unusual expenses or low base year rents—are supported by the evidence standards the ordinance requires. Tenant-rights organizations in San Jose can help explain how the base year adjustment process works and what evidence tenants may raise in response.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 3, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.