Lemont — Title 15 Ch. 15.08 Property Maintenance Code § 15.08.030

Prohibited acts

In Force
Verified 11/10/2026 · Next check 2/8/2027
LemontRetaliation Protections

Operative Text

Lemont — Title 15 Ch. 15.08 Property Maintenance Code § 15.08.030
(a) Retaliatory eviction by owner. No owner or lessor shall evict or cause to evict or terminate the tenancy of a renter or lessee solely as retaliation because that renter or lessee complains to the village or the county circuit court against the owner or lessor charging the owner or lessor with a violation of this section or with a violation of any warranty of habitability accruing to the renter or lessee from the owner or lessor. The fact that the rent or lease consideration of the renter or lessee is not more than 30 days delinquent at the time the owner or lessor gives notice of eviction or termination of a lease or rental and the fact that, within six months prior to the notice of eviction or termination of the lease or rental, the renter or lessee has not been convicted of creating a nuisance at the dwelling or dwelling unit from which an eviction is sought shall be prima facie evidence that the eviction or termination of the lease or rental by the owner or lessor is solely retaliatory because that renter or lessee has complained against the owner or lessor charging him with violation of this section.
(b) Criminal housing management. Criminal housing management is prohibited. A person commits criminal housing management when, having personal management or control of residential real estate, whether as a legal or equitable owner of the residential real estate or as a managing agent or otherwise, he knowingly permits, by his gross carelessness or neglect, the physical condition or facilities of the residential real estate to become or remain so deteriorated that the health and safety of an inhabitant is endangered.
(c) Failure to correct violation. If any alleged violation for which notice as mentioned in subsection (a) of this section has been given is not corrected or eliminated within the time specified in such notice, the owner or occupant shall be guilty of an offense.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Lemont Title 15, Chapter 15.08, § 15.08.030 establishes three distinct prohibitions in the property maintenance context. First, it bars owners and lessors from evicting or terminating a tenancy solely because a renter complained to the village or a circuit court about a code or habitability violation — and it creates a legal presumption of retaliation when rent is less than 30 days overdue and no nuisance conviction occurred within the prior six months. Second, it makes 'criminal housing management' unlawful, meaning that anyone who knowingly allows — through gross carelessness or neglect — residential property to deteriorate to the point of endangering occupant health or safety may face criminal liability. Third, failing to correct a cited violation within the timeframe specified in a notice constitutes a separate offense under this section.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on November 10, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Property owners and managers operating under Lemont § 15.08.030 generally ensure that any eviction or lease-termination decision is grounded in documented, legitimate reasons entirely separate from a tenant's complaints to the village or circuit court. Compliant operators maintain residential properties in a condition that does not endanger occupant health or safety, avoiding the gross carelessness or neglect that constitutes criminal housing management under subsection (b). When a notice of violation is issued, operators typically act promptly to correct the cited condition within the specified timeframe, since failure to do so creates an additional offense under subsection (c).

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Under Lemont § 15.08.030(a), tenants who have complained to the village or a circuit court about a code or habitability violation have a legal basis to challenge an eviction or lease termination they believe is retaliatory — the provision establishes a prima facie presumption of retaliation if rent is less than 30 days past due and no nuisance conviction occurred in the prior six months. Tenants who believe they are facing retaliatory eviction may raise this provision as a defense in eviction proceedings or file a complaint with the Village of Lemont regarding the underlying conditions. Consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid service familiar with Illinois housing law can help tenants understand how subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this provision may apply to their circumstances.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated November 10, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

Rules and statutes that cite this regulation

IL Muni § 15.08.010

Related Rules

§ 2A
Reprisal for reporting violations of law, for tenant's union activity, or actions taken pursuant to laws protecting tenants who are victims of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault or stalking; defense; presumption
§ 47a-20
(Formerly Sec. 19-375a). Retaliatory action by landlord prohibited.
§ 47a-20a
Actions deemed not retaliatory.

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Nov 10, 2026, 03:56 AM UTC