Mount Carmel — Ch. 12 Housing § 12-159
Personal interest of members
Operative Text
No member of the board of housing appeals shall pass upon any question in which he or any corporation in which he is a stockholder is interested.
Section 12-159 of Mount Carmel's Housing Code establishes a conflict-of-interest rule for the Board of Housing Appeals. Under this provision, any board member who has a personal financial stake in a matter — either directly or through a corporation in which they hold stock — is barred from participating in the decision on that matter. The rule is designed to ensure that appeals are decided impartially, without influence from a decision-maker's private interests.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers who bring cases before the Mount Carmel Board of Housing Appeals under Ch. 12 § 12-159 can generally expect that board members with a financial interest in the outcome will be recused from the proceeding. Compliant operators typically document any known conflicts and raise them at the outset of a hearing to preserve the integrity of the process. Being aware of this rule helps operators understand the composition of the panel deciding their appeal.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 12-159 gives tenants appearing before the Mount Carmel Board of Housing Appeals a basis to expect an impartial panel, free from members with a personal or corporate financial interest in the case. If a tenant believes a board member has such a conflict, that concern can generally be raised during the hearing or brought to the attention of the board's administrative staff. Tenant-rights organizations familiar with local housing procedures can help explain how conflict-of-interest objections are typically handled before this board.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 10, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation