Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 12 § 244.80

Enforcement by suit (Minneapolis Housing Code)

In Force
Verified 9/15/2026 · Next check 12/14/2026
MinneapolisHabitability & Repair

Operative Text

Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 12 § 244.80
(a) In addition to the punishments provided in this Code of Ordinances, the city through the officer charged with the enforcement of the various provisions of the housing maintenance code, or any person with standing to sue may seek enforcement thereof in any court of competent jurisdiction by any appropriate form of civil action and may seek enjoinment of any continued violation thereof and seek to compel obedience thereto by mandatory orders and writs.
(b) No tenancy of a dwelling, dwelling unit, two-family dwelling or multiple dwelling covered by the housing maintenance code may be terminated because of the commencement of an action pursuant to this section or because of the report to the proper code enforcement authorities of a condition believed to be in violation of the housing maintenance code. In any action brought for the restitution of premises covered by the housing maintenance code, the lessee may show that notice of termination was received subsequent to the making of a violation report to the proper enforcement authorities or subsequent to the commencement of an action pursuant to this section. Such evidence shall be prima facie proof that the tenancy was terminated in violation of this section. The lessor may rebut the presumption of illegal termination through proof that the termination was for other good cause, including nonpayment of rent, or by showing that in fact no report of a violation was made or an action commenced, prior to notice to terminate being given. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 66.080)
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Minneapolis Code of Ordinances § 244.80 establishes two related rules about housing maintenance code enforcement. First, it authorizes the city or any person with legal standing to pursue civil court action — including injunctions and mandatory orders — to enforce the housing maintenance code, beyond any other penalties the code provides. Second, it prohibits landlords from terminating a tenancy in retaliation for a tenant reporting a code violation or filing a related court action; if a termination notice follows such a report or action, that timing is treated as initial evidence — called prima facie proof — that the termination was retaliatory, though a landlord may rebut that presumption by demonstrating a legitimate reason such as nonpayment of rent.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 15, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under § 244.80, property owners and managers in Minneapolis should be aware that housing maintenance code compliance can be enforced not only through city penalties but also through civil court actions brought by the city or by private parties with standing. Operators who issue a notice to terminate a tenancy after a tenant has filed a code-violation report or commenced a related legal action face a legal presumption that the termination is retaliatory. Landlords who have independent, documented grounds for termination — such as nonpayment of rent — generally maintain records that clearly establish those grounds predated any violation report or court action, in order to rebut that presumption under § 244.80.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Section 244.80 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances provides tenants with an anti-retaliation protection: a landlord generally cannot end a tenancy simply because a tenant reported a housing maintenance code violation to enforcement authorities or participated in a related court action. If a termination notice arrives after such a report or action, that sequence of events serves as prima facie evidence of an illegal retaliatory eviction, which a tenant may raise as a defense in any court proceeding seeking restitution of the premises. Tenants who believe they are facing retaliatory termination under § 244.80 may consider documenting the timeline of their complaint and any subsequent notices, and can explore options such as contacting a local tenant-rights organization or consulting with an attorney familiar with Minneapolis housing law.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 15, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 8.60.130
Severability
§ 15.12.010
Definitions
§ 15.12.240
Temporary housing

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 15, 2026, 09:23 PM UTC