Crawford, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 106 (eCode360 ed. 2026) § 106-4
Multiple convictions to constitute presumptive evidence
Operative Text
Two or more convictions of any person or persons, within a period of one year, for any of the offenses described in Articles 220 and 221 of the Penal Law arising out of conduct engaged in at the same real property consisting of a dwelling as that term is defined in § 4(4) of the Multiple Dwellings Law shall be presumptive evidence of conduct constituting illegal use and occupancy of the real property for the use, possession, sale or manufacture of illegal drugs and of the owner's and landlord's knowledge of such illegal use and occupancy.
Under Crawford, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 106 § 106-4, when two or more drug-related convictions under Articles 220 and 221 of the Penal Law occur at the same dwelling within a single year, that pattern of convictions is treated as presumptive evidence of illegal drug activity on the property. The rule also establishes that such convictions are presumptive evidence that the property's owner and landlord were aware of the illegal use and occupancy. This presumption can be used in proceedings related to the property's status under local law.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Crawford, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 106 § 106-4 creates a legal presumption that works directly against property owners when repeated drug convictions occur at their dwelling. Operators who stay informed about activity at their properties, respond promptly to signs of illegal conduct, and document their oversight efforts are generally better positioned to rebut claims of knowledge. Maintaining active communication with tenants and cooperating with law enforcement are practices commonly associated with compliant property management under provisions like this one.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 106-4 of Crawford's Code of Ordinances ch. 106 establishes a presumption that affects the legal status of a dwelling where repeated drug convictions have occurred, which can have consequences for everyone residing there. Tenants who believe they are being wrongly affected by enforcement actions tied to this provision may find it useful to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid service familiar with local housing law. Understanding how this presumption operates and what evidence might address it is something a qualified housing attorney or advocacy group can help explain.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 10, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.