Newburgh, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 190 § 190-43
Judicial review
Operative Text
Any person or persons, jointly or severally aggrieved by and final order of the head of the code enforcement agency, may seek to have such order reviewed by the Supreme Court in the manner prescribed by Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules and as otherwise provided for in the laws of the State of New York.
Under Newburgh, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 190 § 190-43, any individual or group harmed by a final order issued by the head of the code enforcement agency has the right to seek judicial review of that order. The review is conducted by the New York Supreme Court following the procedures set out in Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, as well as any other applicable state law. This provision establishes a formal legal pathway to challenge final administrative decisions made by the code enforcement authority.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 190-43, a final order issued by the head of the code enforcement agency is not necessarily the last word — any aggrieved party, including a property owner or manager, may seek review in the New York Supreme Court through an Article 78 proceeding. Operators who receive a final adverse order generally document all relevant communications, decisions, and evidence related to the enforcement action, as this record can be central to any subsequent court review. Understanding that this judicial review option exists helps compliant operators recognize the full scope of procedural protections available under Newburgh's code enforcement framework.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 190-43 of Newburgh's Code of Ordinances gives tenants and other aggrieved parties the right to seek court review of a final order from the head of the code enforcement agency by filing an Article 78 proceeding in New York Supreme Court. This means that if a final enforcement decision is believed to be improper or harmful, there is a defined legal mechanism to challenge it before a judge. Tenants who believe they have been adversely affected by such an order may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand how Article 78 procedures might apply to their circumstances.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 7, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation