Valley Stream, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 46A (eCode360 ed. 2026) § 46A-16

Presumptive evidence of over-occupancy

In Force
Verified 11/9/2026 · Next check 2/7/2027
Valley StreamRental Registration

Operative Text

Valley Stream, N.Y., Code of Ordinances ch. 46A (eCode360 ed. 2026) § 46A-16
A. It shall be presumed that a bedroom is over-occupied if more than two mattresses exist in a bedroom. B. The foregoing may be rebutted by evidence presented to the Superintendent of Buildings Department or any court of competent jurisdiction.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Valley Stream Code § 46A-16 establishes a legal presumption that a bedroom is over-occupied whenever more than two mattresses are found in it. This presumption is not conclusive — it can be challenged and overturned by presenting contrary evidence to the Superintendent of Buildings or a court. The rule functions as an evidentiary shortcut: the presence of excess mattresses shifts the burden of explanation rather than automatically establishing a violation.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on November 9, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under § 46A-16, a compliant operator generally ensures that no bedroom in a rental unit contains more than two mattresses, since exceeding that number triggers a legal presumption of over-occupancy before the Valley Stream Superintendent of Buildings or a court. Operators who maintain accurate occupancy records and conduct periodic unit inspections are better positioned to rebut such a presumption if it arises. Documenting the legitimate use of any additional mattresses — such as a fold-away guest mattress — can support a rebuttal if the matter is ever reviewed.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Section 46A-16 means that a finding of more than two mattresses in a bedroom can be used as evidence against occupants in an over-occupancy proceeding, but that finding is not the final word. Occupants have the right to present rebuttal evidence to the Superintendent of Buildings Department or a court of competent jurisdiction to explain the circumstances. Tenants who believe a presumption under this section has been incorrectly applied may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with Valley Stream housing code enforcement.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated November 9, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

Rules and statutes that cite this regulation

Valley Stream Code § 46A-14
Valley Stream Code § 46A-2
Valley Stream Code § 46A-3
Valley Stream Code § 46A-3
Valley Stream Code § 46A-8
Valley Stream Code § 46A-11
Valley Stream Code § 46A-14

Related Rules

§ 244.210
Manner of registering
§ 244.230
Posting
§ 165.10
JUST CAUSE ENFORCEMENT FEE

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Nov 9, 2026, 10:41 PM UTC