24 C.F.R. § 200.222
§ 200.222 Request for reconsideration. (24 CFR Part 200)
Operative Text
(a) Where participation in a Triggering Event has been disapproved, otherwise limited or conditioned because of Previous Participation review, the Controlling Participant may request reconsideration of such determination by a review committee or reviewing officer as established by the Commissioner. Reconsideration decisions shall not be rendered by the same individual who rendered the initial review. (b) The Controlling Participant shall submit requests for such reconsideration in writing within 30 days of receipt of the Commissioner's notice of the determination under § 200.220. (c) The review committee or reviewing officer shall schedule a review of such requests for reconsideration. The Controlling Participant shall be provided written notification of such a review; such notice shall provide at least 7 business days advanced notice of the reconsideration. The Controlling Participant shall be provided the opportunity to submit such supporting materials as the Controlling Participant desires or as the review committee or reviewing officer requests. (d) Before making its decision, the review committee or reviewing officer will analyze the reasons for the decision(s) for which reconsideration is being requested, as well as the documents and arguments presented by the Controlling Participant. The review committee or reviewing officer may affirm, modify, or reverse the initial decision. Upon making its decision, the review committee or reviewing officer will provide written notice of its determination to the Controlling Participant setting forth the reasons for the determination(s).
Under 24 CFR Part 200 § 200.222, when a Controlling Participant's involvement in a federally regulated housing transaction is denied, restricted, or conditioned following a Previous Participation review, the regulation establishes a formal reconsideration process. A written request must be submitted within 30 days of receiving the initial determination notice, and the reconsideration must be conducted by a different individual or body than the one that issued the original decision. The reviewing committee or officer may uphold, modify, or reverse the initial decision and must provide written notice explaining the outcome.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and controlling participants operating under HUD programs should be aware that § 200.222 provides a defined administrative remedy when a Previous Participation review results in a disapproval, limitation, or condition on participation. A compliant operator generally tracks the date of receipt of any determination notice under § 200.220, prepares a written reconsideration request within the 30-day window, and assembles supporting documentation to submit during the review. Operators also typically confirm that the reconsideration is being handled by a reviewer other than the one who issued the original determination, as the regulation requires that separation.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
While § 200.222 primarily governs the rights of Controlling Participants — such as owners and developers — in HUD program reviews, tenants living in affected properties may have an indirect interest in understanding this process. When a property owner's participation is restricted or conditioned, the reconsideration process under this provision can affect the status and management of a housing development. Tenants who believe a reconsideration outcome has affected their housing situation may find it useful to consult a tenant-rights organization or HUD's local field office for information about how administrative decisions under § 200.222 relate to their housing rights.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated September 4, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.