HUD Handbook 7465.1 § 4-3
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES (HUD Public Housing Occupancy Handbook 7465.1)
HUD guidance — not codified law
In Force
Verified 9/25/2026 · Next check 10/2/2026
effective 9/25/2026FederalFair Credit Reporting ActOperative Text
HUD Handbook 7465.1 § 4-3
a. POLICY
(1) If a PHA receives unfavorable information about an
applicant, it must consider the possibility of
more favorable future conduct. This would be
especially important in evaluating applicants who
are borderline in the PHA's evaluation process.
These families may have a mixed credit record,
some housekeeping problems, a police record, or a
good and a bad report from previous landlords.
b. DISCUSSION
(1) Some mitigating circumstances which a PHA could
consider in evaluating applicants who do not fully
meet its standards for admission are:
(a) That the applicant shows evidence of
rehabilitation as indicated by a report from
a parole officer or social worker.
(b) That the family is aware of the-problem they
have been having and is taking steps to
improve the situation, such as getting
counseling or participating in an alcohol or
drug treatment program.
(c) That the family is likely to improve its
financial situation because:
o its rent will be lower once the family
is admitted to public housing; or
o participation in a job training program
or improved employment prospects will
probably result in higher family income.
(d) That the family would be able to receive
vendor payments.
(2) Vendor payments
(a) Vendor payments involve the direct payment of
the rent from a welfare agency or other
source to the PHA. PHAs may want to consider
accepting vendor payments for families which
have been delinquent in paying rent.
(b) Vendor payments are a departure from the
landlord-tenant relationship and should be
considered only on a case-by-case basis.
They should not
be applied to an entire group of tenants such
as to all families receiving AFDC benefits.
(c) Vendor payments are permitted in the Aid to
Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
program if the state welfare plan provides
for them and:
o the family has misused funds as
evidenced by nonpayment of bills. (In
this case the payments, usually referred
to as protective payments, cannot be
continued for more than two years and
are usually for a shorter period.)
or
o the welfare recipient requests the
vendor payments. (In this case the
payments continue until the recipient
requests that they be stopped.)
(d) It may be possible for a family to arrange
for vendor payments to be made by an
employer.
(3) In deciding whether to admit applicants who are
borderline in the PHA's evaluation process, the
PHA should recognize that for every marginal
applicant it admits, it is not admitting another
applicant who clearly meets the PHA's evaluation
standards.
c. REFERENCES
24 CFR 960.205(d)
45 CFR 234 (vendor payments-AFDC)Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Effective Timeline
Current
Sep 25, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.
Related Rules
§ 1022.1
§ 1022.1 Purpose, scope, and model forms and disclosures.
§ 1022.2
§ 1022.2 Examples.
§ 1022.3
§ 1022.3 Definitions.