HUD Handbook 7465.1 § 5-7

SELECTING APPLICANTS FROM THE WAITING LIST (HUD Public Housing Occupancy Handbook 7465.1)

HUD guidance — not codified law
In Force
Verified 9/25/2026 · Next check 10/2/2026
effective 9/25/2026FederalPublic Housing

Operative Text

HUD Handbook 7465.1 § 5-7
a.   POLICY

            (1)   In filling an actual or expected vacancy, the PHA
                  must offer the dwelling to an applicant needing
                  that size and type of unit in that type of
                  project, with the PHA making the offer in
                  sequence, until someone accepts it, in the order
                  of the applicants' priority, based on the PHA's
                  tenant selection preferences and the date and time
                  of application.

            (2)   The PHA must adopt procedures which will limit the
                  duration of a vacancy due to turnover to the
                  minimum amount of time necessary.

            (3)   Each PHA must follow its tenant selection plan,
                  which has been duly adopted and approved by HUD,
                  and which describes whether an applicant is
                  permitted one offer or up to three offers before
                  dropping to the bottom of the waiting list.

            (4)   Unless otherwise approved by HUD, the number of
                  offers an applicant can be given must be according
                  to one of the following two plans:

                  (a)   A 1 offer plan, (Plan A)

                        This plan is not based on the distribution of
                        vacancies in the PHA's projects.

                        The applicant is offered a suitable unit. If
                        the applicant refuses it, the applicant's
                        name goes to the bottom of the waiting list.

                  (b)   A 2-3 offer plan, (Plan B)

                      This plan is based on the distribution of
                      vacancies in the PHA's projects.

                      The PHA determines how many locations within
                      its jurisdiction have available units of
                      suitable size and type in the appropriate
                      type of project. If a suitable unit is
                      available in:

                      o    3 or more locations, the applicant must
                           be offered a suitable unit in the
                           location with the highest number of
                           vacancies. If the offer is rejected,
                           the applicant must be offered a suitable
                           unit in the location with the second
                           highest number of vacancies. If that
                           offer is rejected, the applicant

must be offered a suitable unit in the
                           location with the third highest number
                           of vacancies. If that offer is
                           rejected, the applicant's name must be
                           put at the bottom of the waiting list.

                      o    2 locations, the applicant must be
                           offered a suitable unit in the location
                           with the higher number of vacancies. If
                           the offer is rejected, the applicant
                           must be offered a suitable unit at the
                           other location. If that offer is
                           rejected, the applicant's name must be
                           moved to the bottom of the waiting list.

                      o    1 location, the applicant must be
                           offered a suitable unit in that
                           location. If the offer is rejected, the
                           applicant must be offered the next
                           suitable unit that becomes available,
                           whether it is at the same location as
                           the first offer or at another location.
                           If the applicant rejects the second
                           offer, the applicant's name must be put
                           at the bottom of the waiting list.

            (5)   Under any tenant selection plan, the PHA must
                  maintain a record of the units offered, including
                  location, date, and circumstances of each offer,
                  and each rejection or acceptance. The PHA must
                  note the reason for any rejection.

    b.      DISCUSSION

       (1)   Only under a tenant selection plan not based on
             the distribution of vacancies is an app7icant
             given only one offer before the applicant's name
             goes to the bottom of the waiting list.

       (2)   If a PHA adopts a tenant selection plan that is
             based on the distribution of vacancies, the PHA
             must offer-an applicant at least two suitable
             units before putting the applicant's name on the
             bottom of the waiting list. However, the first
             offer must be rejected before the second offer can
             be made. If there is only one suitable unit
             available and the offer is rejected, the applicant
             maintains the same position on the waiting list
             until another suitable unit is offered.

       (3)   Since the availability of units of a particular
             size and type will usually vary within a PHA, a PHA
             which has adopted a plan based on the distribution
             of vacancies may have to make three offers to some
             applicants but only two offers to others.

(4)   A PHA may determine that "the bottom of the
             waiting list" means denying the applicant the
             benefit of all the PHA's tenant selection
             preferences, including any preference based on
             income range, for a specific period of time, and
             establishing a new date and time of application
             based on when the final offer of a suitable unit
             was rejected. This would prevent the applicant
             from quickly recycling to the top of the waiting
             list.

       (5)   An applicant who asked to be removed from the
             waiting list after rejecting all the PHA's offers
             could reapply to the same PHA, but could be denied
             the benefit of all of that PHA's tenant selection
             preferences, including any preference based on
             income range, for a specific period of time.

       (6)   For purposes of this discussion, an applicant
             would not be considered to have been offered a
             unit if:

             (a)   the unit is not of the proper size and type
                   and the applicant would be able to reside
                   there only temporarily (e.g., a specially
                   designed unit that is awaiting a handicapped
                   applicant needing such a unit.)

             (b)   the unit contains lead-based paint, and

                        accepting the offer could result in
                        subjecting the applicant's children under
                        seven years of age to lead-based paint
                        poisoning.

                  (c)   the applicant is unable to move at the time
                        of the offer and presents clear evidence
                        which substantiates this to the PHA's
                        satisfaction. Examples:

                        o   a doctor verifies that the applicant has
                            just underdone major surgery and needs a
                            period to recuperate;

                        o   a court verifies that the applicant is
                            serving on a jury which has been
                            sequestered.

                  (d)   accepting the offer would result in undue
                        hardship to the applicant not related to
                        consideration of race, color, national
                        origin, or language, such as making
                        employment or day care facilities
                        inaccessible, and the applicant presents
                        clear evidence which substantiates this to
                        the PHA's satisfaction.

(7)   A "location" (site) is not always the same as a
                  project.

                  (a)   A location may have more than one project.

                        HUD defines a site as any common geographic
                        area undivided by natural or manmade barriers
                        (such as rivers, highways, railroads or other
                        major obstructions) that block or impede
                        normal pedestrian traffic.

                  (b)   Individual dwelling units in a scattered site
                        project may be grouped and identified as one
                        location if they are within a block of each
                        other.

            (8)   The "highest number of vacancies" means:

                  (a)   vacancies in units of all sizes and types,
                        not just the size and type the applicant
                        needs. For example, if Location A has 5
                        vacancies, one of which is suitable to the
                        applicant, and Location B has 3 vacancies,
                        all of which are suitable to the applicant, a

                      PHA with a plan that requires the offers to
                      come from the location with the highest
                      number of vacancies would have to offer the
                      applicant the unit in Location A first.

                (b)   the actual number of vacancies, not the
                      number of vacancies as a percentage of all
                      units in that location. For example, if
                      Location X has 100 units, 15 of which are
                      vacant, and Location Y has 20 units, 10 of
                      which are vacant, a PHA which has a tenant
                      selection plan based on the distribution of
                      vacancies would have to offer the applicant
                      the unit in Location X first.

       c.   HUD RESPONSIBILITY

            The Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
            Opportunity must approve any change in a tenant
            selection plan which, in design or effect, is not
            racially neutral. This would include approving any
            change from a I offer plan to a 2-3 offer plan, or
            vice-versa, which is related to complying with Title VI
            of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

       d.   REFERENCES

            Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

            24 CFR 1.4(b)(2)(ii)

            24 CFR 960-203
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim

Effective Timeline

Current
Sep 25, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 960.101
§ 960.101 Applicability.
§ 960.102
§ 960.102 Definitions.
§ 960.103
§ 960.103 Equal opportunity requirements and protection for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 25, 2026, 10:56 AM UTC