Cal. Civ. Code § 24-34-506

Probable cause.

In Force
Verified 10/16/2026 · Next check 10/23/2026
effective 10/16/2026ColoradoFair Housing & Anti-Discrimination

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 24-34-506
In making
his determination on probable cause under the provisions of section 24-34-306
(2), the director shall find that probable cause exists if upon all the facts
and circumstances a person of reasonable prudence and caution would be
warranted in a belief that an unfair housing practice has been committed.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-506, the director responsible for reviewing housing discrimination complaints applies a 'reasonable prudence and caution' standard when deciding whether probable cause exists. This means the director evaluates all available facts and circumstances to determine whether a reasonably careful person would believe an unfair housing practice occurred. The provision does not require certainty—only that the totality of the evidence supports a reasonable belief that a violation took place.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 16, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-506 establishes the threshold at which a housing discrimination complaint advances past the initial review stage. Operators who maintain thorough documentation of their rental decisions, policies, and communications are generally better positioned to demonstrate that their practices are consistent and non-discriminatory during a probable cause review. Understanding that the director's standard is based on the overall picture of facts—not a single piece of evidence—underscores why consistent, well-documented practices matter throughout the leasing and management process.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-506 sets out the standard the director uses when deciding whether a housing discrimination complaint has enough support to move forward. A complainant does not need to prove their case outright at this stage; the director only needs to find that a reasonable person, looking at all the facts, could believe an unfair housing practice occurred. Tenants who believe they have experienced housing discrimination may consider filing a complaint with the appropriate state agency, documenting relevant interactions and communications, or reaching out to a tenant-rights organization to better understand the process.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 16, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Oct 16, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

Rules and statutes cited by this regulation

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-306
Not yet ingested

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 5.106
§ 5.106 Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender identity in community planning and development programs.
§ 5.109
§ 5.109 Equal participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs and activities.
§ 2
Policies; recommendations

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Oct 16, 2026, 05:15 PM UTC