16 Del. C. §§ 6631–6636 § 6636
Exceptions; claims of negligence
Operative Text
Failure to comply with this subchapter shall not be considered as evidence of either comparative or contributory negligence in any civil suit or insurance claim adjudication arising out of any injury or death arising from a fire or the direct consequences of a fire; nor shall failure to comply with this subchapter be admissible as evidence in any trial of any civil action or insurance claim adjudication.
Under 16 Del. C. §§ 6631–6636, a person's failure to follow the smoke-detector and fire-safety requirements of this subchapter cannot be used against them in a civil lawsuit or insurance claim proceeding as evidence of comparative or contributory negligence when the case involves injury or death caused by a fire or its direct consequences. In other words, noncompliance with these provisions is legally inadmissible in such proceedings. The rule carves out a specific evidentiary limitation that applies regardless of which party failed to comply.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers subject to 16 Del. C. §§ 6631–6636 should understand that while this provision bars noncompliance from being introduced as negligence evidence in fire-related civil suits or insurance adjudications, it does not eliminate the underlying duty to comply with the subchapter's fire-safety requirements. Compliant operators generally maintain functioning smoke detectors and other required safety equipment as a matter of routine property management, independent of this evidentiary protection. Awareness of this provision can inform how operators document their compliance practices and communicate with insurers.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Under 16 Del. C. §§ 6631–6636, tenants involved in fire-related civil actions or insurance claim proceedings should be aware that a landlord's failure to comply with this subchapter's fire-safety requirements cannot be introduced as evidence of negligence in those proceedings. This evidentiary limitation shapes what arguments may or may not be available in such legal contexts. Tenants seeking to understand how this rule affects their rights in a specific proceeding may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with Delaware housing law.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 22, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation