Cal. Civ. Code § 8-2-213

Final review of projects; agreement of local authorities.

In Force
Verified 10/28/2026 · Next check 11/4/2026
GeorgiaRent Regulation

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 8-2-213
Where an existing building or structure falls within the jurisdiction of both state level and local level enforcement authorities, the final review of any part of the project which is under the jurisdiction of both such enforcement authorities shall occur with the state authority; provided, however, that the local fire and building authorities must agree in writing with any compliance alternatives before such can be approved by the state authority. It is the intent of this Code section that the state enforcement authority be very liberal in the consideration and approval of compliance alternatives which have the documented support of local enforcement authorities.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under O.C.G.A. § 8-2-213, when a building or structure is subject to oversight by both state and local enforcement authorities, the state authority holds final review power over any portion of the project that falls under shared jurisdiction. However, local fire and building authorities must provide written agreement before the state authority can approve any compliance alternatives. The provision also signals that the state enforcement authority is expected to be broadly receptive to compliance alternatives that carry documented local support.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 28, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Property owners and managers working on projects covered by O.C.G.A. § 8-2-213 generally coordinate with both local fire and building authorities and the state enforcement authority when their building falls under dual jurisdiction. Compliant operators typically secure written agreement from local authorities before seeking state approval of any compliance alternatives, since that written sign-off is a prerequisite under this section. Maintaining clear documentation of local support can be important, as the statute directs the state authority to be especially receptive to alternatives backed by local enforcement agencies.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

O.C.G.A. § 8-2-213 establishes a framework that governs how buildings subject to both state and local oversight are reviewed, which can affect the safety and code-compliance status of residential properties. Tenants who have concerns about whether a building's compliance alternatives were properly reviewed and approved through this dual-authority process may consider reaching out to their local fire or building authority to understand what approvals are on record. Tenant-rights organizations can also help residents understand how state and local enforcement coordination under this provision may relate to habitability or safety concerns in their building.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 28, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

Rules and statutes that cite this regulation

O.C.G.A. § 8-2-20
O.C.G.A. § 8-2-23
O.C.G.A. § 8-2-24

Related Rules

§ 151.21
HURRICANE KATRINA AND HURRICANE RITA TEMPORARY RELIEF PROGRAM
§ 5
Claim by foreclosing owner to set new use and occupancy rate
§ 2
Purpose