Cal. Civ. Code § 32-31-6-10
Other claims
Operative Text
Sec. 10. The adjudication of an emergency possessory claim under section 6(b), 7(c), or 7.1(b) of this chapter does not bar a subsequent claim a party may have against the other party arising out of the landlord and tenant relationship unless that claim has been adjudicated under section 9 of this chapter.
Indiana Code § 32-31-6-10 establishes that resolving an emergency possessory claim — the kind brought under specific subsections of this chapter — does not automatically extinguish other claims that either party might have against the other stemming from the landlord-tenant relationship. In other words, winning or losing an emergency possession proceeding leaves the door open for follow-on legal actions, such as claims for damages or other relief, unless those additional claims were already decided under section 9 of the same chapter. The provision essentially prevents one narrow emergency ruling from functioning as a blanket resolution of all disputes between the parties.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Ind. Code § 32-31-6-10, property owners and managers should understand that obtaining or contesting an emergency possessory ruling does not resolve every potential claim arising from the tenancy. Operators who pursue emergency possession proceedings under the referenced subsections may still face — or bring — separate claims related to unpaid rent, property damage, or other landlord-tenant matters, provided those claims were not already adjudicated under section 9. Keeping thorough records of the tenancy, communications, and any damages is a practice commonly associated with being prepared for any subsequent proceedings.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Ind. Code § 32-31-6-10 means that if a landlord obtains an emergency possessory ruling against a tenant, that outcome does not automatically bar the tenant from pursuing separate claims arising from the rental relationship — and the same is true in reverse. Tenants who have been subject to an emergency possession proceeding may still have grounds to raise additional claims, such as those related to security deposits, habitability, or other landlord-tenant matters, as long as those claims were not already decided under section 9 of this chapter. Tenants seeking to understand their options after such a proceeding may benefit from consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with Indiana landlord-tenant law.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation