Iowa Admin. Code r. 161—9 § 161—9.8
Protective orders.
Operative Text
9.8(1) Upon motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought or by any person who may be affected thereby, and for good cause shown, the presiding officer for discovery: a. May make any order which justice requires to protect a party or other person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: (1) That the discovery not be had; (2) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place; (3) That the discovery may be had only by a method of discovery other than that selected by the commission; (4) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of the discovery be limited to certain matters; (5) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the presiding officer for discovery; (6) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of a court, a commission contested case presiding officer, or the presiding officer for discovery; (7) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; (8) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the presiding officer for discovery. b. Shall limit the frequency of use of the methods described in subrule 9.6(1) if the presiding officer for discovery determines that: (1) The discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; (2) The commission has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or (3) The discovery is unduly burdensome or expensive, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, limitations on the objecting party’s resources, and the importance of the issues at stake in the investigation. 9.8(2) If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the presiding officer for discovery may, on such terms and conditions as are just, order that any party or other person provide or permit discovery. 9.8(3) Award of expenses of motion. If the motion is granted, the presiding officer for discovery shall, after opportunity for hearing, require the commission, if it opposed the motion, to pay to the party or other person making the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including attorneys’ fees, unless the presiding officer for discovery finds that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. If the motion is denied, the presiding officer for discovery shall, after opportunity for hearing, require the party or deponent who made the motion or the party or attorney advising such a motion or both of them to pay to the commission the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion, including attorneys’ fees, unless the presiding officer for discovery finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the presiding officer for discovery may apportion in a just manner the reasonable expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
Iowa Admin. Code r. 161—9 § 161—9.8 establishes a mechanism within Iowa Civil Rights Commission proceedings by which any party, or a person affected by a discovery request, may seek a protective order from the presiding officer for discovery. When good cause is shown, the presiding officer has broad discretion to limit, condition, or entirely prohibit certain discovery activities in order to prevent annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden. The rule also sets out a cost-shifting framework: if a motion for a protective order is granted or denied, the losing side may be required to pay the reasonable expenses—including attorneys' fees—of the prevailing side, unless the losing side's position was substantially justified or other circumstances make such an award unjust.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners or managers who are respondents in an Iowa Civil Rights Commission proceeding governed by Iowa Admin. Code r. 161—9 § 161—9.8 should be aware that discovery requests issued by the commission can be challenged through a motion for a protective order when those requests are unduly burdensome, duplicative, or disproportionate to the needs of the case. Operators who successfully obtain a protective order may be entitled to recover reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, from the commission if it opposed the motion without substantial justification. Conversely, filing a protective order motion that is denied without substantial justification can result in an obligation to reimburse the commission's expenses, so compliant operators generally evaluate the merits of any such motion carefully before filing.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Tenants or complainants involved in Iowa Civil Rights Commission proceedings under Iowa Admin. Code r. 161—9 § 161—9.8 have the right to seek a protective order if a discovery request directed at them causes annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden. If such a motion is granted and the commission opposed it without substantial justification, the presiding officer for discovery may require the commission to pay the moving party's reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees. Individuals navigating this process may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider to understand the range of options available, including how to document good cause for a protective order.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 18, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API