Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-25,104
Finding of unconscionability, remedies; evidence.
Operative Text
(a) If the court, as a matter of law, finds that: (1) A rental agreement or any provision thereof was unconscionable when made, the court may refuse to enforce the agreement, enforce the remainder of the agreement without the unconscionable provision or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid an unconscionable result. (2) A settlement in which a party waives or agrees to forego a claim or right under this act or under a rental agreement was unconscionable at the time it was made, the court may refuse to enforce the settlement, enforce the remainder of the settlement without the unconscionable provision or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid any unconscionable result. (b) If unconscionability is put into issue by a party or by the court upon its own motion the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to the setting, purpose and effect of the rental agreement or settlement to aid the court in making the determination.
Kansas law under Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 58-2501 through 58-25,104 gives courts the authority to address rental agreements or settlement terms that are found to be unconscionable — meaning grossly unfair or one-sided — at the time they were made. A court may throw out the entire agreement, remove only the offending provision while keeping the rest intact, or narrow the provision's reach to prevent an unjust outcome. When unconscionability is raised by either party or by the court itself, both sides must be given a fair chance to present evidence about the context, purpose, and effect of the agreement or settlement.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 58-2501 through 58-25,104, property owners and managers generally ensure that every clause in a rental agreement reflects a fair, balanced exchange of rights and obligations. Operators typically review lease terms and any settlement agreements to confirm that no provision could be characterized as oppressive or shockingly one-sided at the time of signing. Maintaining clear documentation of the negotiation context and the purpose behind each lease term can help demonstrate that an agreement was entered into fairly if the issue is ever raised before a court.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 58-2501 through 58-25,104 provides tenants with a legal avenue to challenge rental agreement provisions or settlement terms that were unconscionable when made. A tenant who believes a lease clause or a waiver they signed was grossly unfair may raise unconscionability as an issue in court, and the court is required to allow both sides to present evidence about the circumstances surrounding the agreement. Tenants exploring this option may find it helpful to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid office familiar with Kansas landlord-tenant law for general information about how courts have applied this standard.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 18, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation