Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2544
Finding of unconscionability; remedies; evidence.
Operative Text
(a) If the court, as a matter of law, finds: (1) A rental agreement or any provision thereof was unconscionable when made, the court may refuse to enforce the agreement, enforce the remainder of the agreement without the unconscionable provision, or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid an unconscionable result; or (2) a settlement in which a party waives or agrees to forego a claim or right under this act or under a rental agreement was unconscionable at the time it was made, the court may refuse to enforce the settlement, enforce the remainder of the settlement without the unconscionable provision or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid any unconscionable result. (b) If unconscionability is put into issue by a party or by the court upon its own motion, the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to the setting, purpose and effect of the rental agreement or settlement to aid the court in making the determination.
Under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2544, Kansas courts have the authority to address rental agreements or settlement terms that are found to be unconscionable—meaning grossly unfair or one-sided—at the time they were made. A court may refuse to enforce the entire agreement, strike only the offending provision while keeping the rest intact, or narrow the provision's application to prevent an unjust outcome. When unconscionability is raised, either by a party or by the court on its own initiative, both sides must be given a fair opportunity to present evidence about the context, purpose, and effect of the agreement or settlement.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2544 signals that lease terms or settlement agreements perceived as grossly one-sided at the time of signing are vulnerable to judicial scrutiny. Operators who draft rental agreements generally ensure that all provisions are reasonable, clearly disclosed, and mutually understood before execution, reducing the risk that any clause could later be characterized as unconscionable. Maintaining documentation of how lease terms were presented and agreed upon can be relevant if a court ever examines the setting and purpose of the agreement under this provision.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2544 provides a legal avenue for challenging rental agreement clauses or settlement terms that were fundamentally unfair when made. If a tenant believes a provision or a waiver they signed was unconscionable, that issue can be raised in court proceedings, where both parties are entitled to present evidence about the circumstances surrounding the agreement. Tenants who believe they may have signed an unconscionable term or settlement can explore their options by contacting a local tenant-rights organization or legal aid office familiar with Kansas landlord-tenant law.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 18, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation