Cal. Civ. Code § 7

Judgments; effect

In Force
Verified 9/13/2026 · Next check 9/20/2026
effective 9/13/2026MassachusettsEviction & Just Cause

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 7
Section 7. The judgment in an action under this chapter shall not be a bar to any action thereafter brought by either party to recover the land or tenements in question, or to recover damages for any trespass thereon; but the amount recovered for rent under section five shall be deducted in any assessment of damages in such subsequent action by the original plaintiff.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under Mass. Gen. Laws c. 239 § 7, a judgment reached in a summary process (eviction) action does not permanently resolve who has the superior legal right to the property. Either party may still bring a separate, later lawsuit to establish ownership or recover damages for trespass. However, any rent amount already recovered under section five of the same chapter must be subtracted from any damages awarded to the original plaintiff in that subsequent action, preventing a double recovery.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on September 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Mass. Gen. Laws c. 239 § 7 means that winning or losing a summary process case does not foreclose a landlord's ability to pursue a separate action to assert ownership rights or seek trespass damages. Operators who have already recovered rent under section five should be aware that those amounts will be offset against any damages awarded in a later proceeding. Keeping clear financial records of amounts recovered in summary process actions is a practice that supports accurate accounting in any subsequent litigation.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Under Mass. Gen. Laws c. 239 § 7, a tenant is not permanently barred from contesting ownership or property rights simply because a summary process judgment was entered. The provision preserves the right of either party to bring a later action, which may be relevant if underlying title or trespass issues were not fully resolved in the eviction proceeding. Tenants who believe they have unresolved property-rights claims may wish to consult a tenant-rights organization or legal aid office to understand what options this provision may preserve for them.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated September 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Sep 13, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 127G
Removal from district to superior or housing court; transmittal of rents and removal fees
§ 10
Rent as a necessary
§ 17
Occupancy constituting tenancy at will; termination

Source Information

Snapshot SHA:
Fetched:Sep 13, 2026, 02:39 PM UTC