Cal. Civ. Code § 213.112
Applicability
Operative Text
Legally permissible actions pursuant to section 441.020 are subject to the provisions of this chapter only if a primary motive for the section 441.020 action is not any of the factors listed in section 441.020.
Missouri Revised Statutes § 213.112 establishes a boundary between landlord actions that are legally permitted under § 441.020 and the anti-discrimination protections found in Chapter 213. Specifically, a landlord's otherwise lawful action under § 441.020 falls under Chapter 213's fair-housing rules only when a prohibited discriminatory factor—such as race, religion, or national origin—is a primary motivation for that action. If the primary motive is something other than a protected characteristic listed in § 441.020, Chapter 213's provisions do not apply to that action.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under § 213.112, property owners and managers should be aware that any action taken pursuant to § 441.020—such as lease termination or refusal to renew—can be scrutinized under Missouri's fair-housing chapter if a discriminatory factor appears to be a primary driver of that decision. Compliant operators generally document the legitimate, non-discriminatory business reasons behind their § 441.020 actions, such as nonpayment of rent or lease violations, to demonstrate that no protected characteristic was a primary motive. Maintaining consistent, well-documented policies helps show that decisions are grounded in lawful criteria rather than factors prohibited under § 441.020.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Section 213.112 means that tenants who believe a landlord's § 441.020 action—such as an eviction or non-renewal—was primarily motivated by a characteristic protected under Missouri's anti-discrimination law may have grounds to invoke Chapter 213's protections. Tenants in this situation can explore options such as raising a discrimination defense in a housing proceeding, filing a complaint with a relevant fair-housing agency, or reaching out to a tenant-rights organization for general information. Because the key question under § 213.112 is whether a prohibited factor was the primary motive, gathering any available evidence of the landlord's stated or implied reasons for the action may be relevant to understanding one's options.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API