Cal. Civ. Code § 534.590
Writs of restitution, against whom executed
Operative Text
The officer having charge of a writ of restitution or rerestitution, or execution with a clause to that effect, shall have power to expel and remove from the premises mentioned and defendant therein named, his servants and others under his control, and all other persons who shall have entered thereon after the commencement of the suit otherwise than by process of law, and to deliver to the plaintiff possession thereof.
Missouri Revised Statutes § 534.590 defines the scope of authority granted to law enforcement officers carrying out a writ of restitution or similar court order in an eviction proceeding. Under this provision, the officer is empowered to remove not only the named defendant but also that person's household members, employees, and anyone else under the defendant's control, as well as any third parties who entered the property after the lawsuit began without legal authorization. The ultimate purpose of the writ is to restore physical possession of the premises to the plaintiff, typically the landlord or property owner.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 534.590, once a court issues a writ of restitution, the executing officer has broad authority to clear the premises of the named defendant and anyone connected to or brought in by that defendant after the suit commenced. Compliant operators generally work with the court and law enforcement to ensure the writ accurately names the defendant and describes the premises, so the officer can act within the scope of the order. Landlords typically coordinate with the serving officer rather than attempting to remove occupants themselves, since the statute places removal authority squarely with the officer.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 534.590 means that a writ of restitution can be enforced not just against the tenant named in the eviction suit, but also against others living in or occupying the unit under that tenant's control, and against anyone who moved in after the lawsuit began without a court-sanctioned right to be there. Tenants who believe they have an independent legal right to occupy the premises—separate from the named defendant—may have grounds to raise that status before the executing officer or in court, since the statute limits removal to those without a lawful basis for entry. Consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid office can help occupants understand whether their particular circumstances fall within or outside the reach of this provision.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 14, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
Rules and statutes that cite this regulation