Cal. Civ. Code § 250.311

Damages for Removal of Property Distrained On

In Force
Verified 10/26/2026 · Next check 11/25/2026
effective 10/9/2026PennsylvaniaLockouts & Self-Help

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 250.311
Any landlord having distrained upon
personal property for rent due who is aggrieved by the unlawful removal thereof shall,
in an action of trespass, recover treble damages, together with the costs of suit,
against the offender or against the owner, if it be afterwards found that the personal
property has come into his use or possession.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under 68 P.S. § 250.311, when a landlord has legally seized a tenant's personal property as security for unpaid rent (a process called distraint) and that property is then unlawfully removed or taken away, the law provides a remedy through a trespass action. A court may award the landlord three times the actual damages suffered, plus the costs of bringing the lawsuit. Liability can extend not only to the person who physically removed the property but also to any owner who later comes into possession or use of it.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 10, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under 68 P.S. § 250.311, landlords who have properly executed a distraint on personal property for overdue rent have a legal avenue if that property is unlawfully taken away. A compliant operator typically documents the distrained property thoroughly—recording its condition, location, and estimated value—so that a treble-damages claim in trespass can be substantiated if removal occurs. Operators generally work with legal counsel familiar with Pennsylvania landlord-tenant law to ensure the underlying distraint was conducted lawfully, since the remedy under this section depends on the validity of the original seizure.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Under 68 P.S. § 250.311, tenants and third parties should be aware that removing property that has been lawfully distrained by a landlord for unpaid rent can expose the person who removed it—or anyone who later possesses or uses it—to a lawsuit for three times the value of the property plus court costs. If you believe a landlord's distraint was itself unlawful or improperly executed, that may be relevant to any trespass action brought under this section, and tenant-rights organizations in Pennsylvania can help explain the procedural requirements that govern distraint. Consulting a licensed Pennsylvania attorney or a local legal aid organization is one way to understand how this provision might apply to a particular set of facts.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 10, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Current
Oct 9, 2026
Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 27
Jurisdiction of courts to restrain violation of Secs. 23 to 26; applicability of other laws to requests to change locks
§ 18
Entry into land; legal proceedings required to recover possession of land or tenements; jurisdiction
§ 5-3-12-1
LOCKOUTS PROHIBITED

Source Information