R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 34-20 § 34-20-11
Termination of tenancy for failure to pay increased rent imposed as penalty
Operative Text
When proceedings commenced under this chapter are to regain possession of the premises following the alleged termination of a tenancy, if the defendant alleges and it appears by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff attempted to increase the defendant's obligations under the letting as a penalty for the justified lawful acts described in the preceding section, and that the defendant's failure to perform the additional obligations was a material reason for the alleged termination, judgment shall be entered for the defendant on the claim of possession, and all the additional obligations shall be void.
Under Rhode Island law, R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-20-11, a landlord cannot use a rent increase or other added obligation as a form of retaliation against a tenant for engaging in legally protected activities described in the preceding section of the chapter. If a tenant can show by a preponderance of the evidence that such an increase was retaliatory and that their refusal to pay it was a material reason for the eviction proceeding, the court must rule in the tenant's favor on the possession claim. Any obligations imposed as that penalty are also declared void under this provision.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers operating under Rhode Island law should be aware that § 34-20-11 prohibits using rent increases or added lease obligations as a response to a tenant's legally protected conduct. A compliant operator generally ensures that any rent adjustment is grounded in legitimate, documented business reasons—such as market conditions or increased operating costs—rather than timed to follow a tenant's exercise of protected rights. Maintaining clear records of the rationale behind any rent changes helps demonstrate that increases are not retaliatory in nature.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Rhode Island's § 34-20-11 gives tenants a defense in eviction proceedings if they can show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a rent increase or added obligation was imposed as retaliation for lawful protected activity and that their refusal to comply was a material reason for the eviction. If this defense succeeds, the court must enter judgment for the tenant on the possession claim and void the retaliatory obligations entirely. Tenants who believe they are facing a retaliatory eviction may consider raising this statutory defense in court, consulting a tenant-rights organization familiar with Rhode Island housing law, or seeking guidance from Rhode Island Legal Services.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 15, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.