Cal. Civ. Code § 29-18-103

Forcible detainer defined.

In Force
Verified 10/29/2026 · Next check 11/5/2026
TennesseeEviction & Just Cause

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 29-18-103
A forcible detainer is where a person enters lawfully or peaceably, and holds unlawfully, and by any of the means enumerated in § 29-18-102 as constituting a forcible entry.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Under Tenn. Code Ann. tit. 29, ch. 18 § 29-18-103, Tennessee law distinguishes between how a person initially enters a property and how they continue to occupy it. A 'forcible detainer' occurs when someone who entered a property lawfully or peaceably later refuses to leave and holds the property through the same kinds of force, threats, or intimidation that would constitute a forcible entry under § 29-18-102. In other words, a peaceful entry does not shield an occupant from legal consequences if the continued possession becomes unlawful and coercive.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 29, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Property owners and managers in Tennessee should be aware that § 29-18-103 provides a legal basis for removing an occupant even when that person originally entered the premises with permission or without force. A compliant operator generally documents the terms under which any person is permitted to occupy the property, so that a transition from lawful to unlawful holding can be clearly established if a detainer action becomes necessary. Understanding the connection between § 29-18-103 and the enumerated acts in § 29-18-102 helps operators recognize when a situation may qualify for a forcible detainer proceeding under Tennessee law.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Tenants in Tennessee should understand that § 29-18-103 means a landlord may pursue a forcible detainer action even if the tenant originally moved in lawfully, if the landlord alleges the continued occupancy involves the kinds of conduct described in § 29-18-102. Knowing this distinction can be relevant when evaluating whether a detainer claim against you has a proper legal basis, and tenants may raise procedural or substantive defenses in court if the alleged conduct does not meet the statutory definition. Tenant-rights organizations and legal aid services can help explain how § 29-18-103 applies to particular circumstances and what options may be available in a detainer proceeding.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 29, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 151.20
TEMPORARY EVICTION CONTROLS AND RENT REDUCTIONS FOR MOBILE HOMES DAMAGED IN THE JANUARY, 1994 EARTHQUAKE
§ 1
Definitions
§ 2
Eviction of tenants prohibited; exceptions