Cal. Civ. Code § 29-18-133

Penalty for resuming possession.

In Force
Verified 10/29/2026 · Next check 11/5/2026
TennesseeEviction & Just Cause

Operative Text

Cal. Civ. Code § 29-18-133
(a) A person, once dispossessed by action, who again illegally possesses the premises, commits a Class C misdemeanor.
(b) The only evidence, required or admitted on the trial of the criminal charge, is that the defendant was turned out of possession by action brought for the purpose, and that the defendant has again taken possession of the premises.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Tennessee Code Ann. tit. 29, ch. 18 § 29-18-133 addresses what happens when someone who has already been removed from a property through a formal legal dispossession action returns and retakes possession without authorization. Under this provision, that act of re-entry constitutes a Class C misdemeanor under Tennessee law. The rule is notable for its streamlined evidentiary standard: at trial, the prosecution need only show that the person was previously removed by legal action and that they subsequently retook possession.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on October 29, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

Under Tenn. Code Ann. tit. 29, ch. 18 § 29-18-133, property owners and managers who have successfully completed a dispossession action have a criminal-law backstop if the removed party returns and retakes the premises. Operators who document the original dispossession proceeding and any subsequent unauthorized re-entry preserve the two key pieces of evidence the statute identifies as sufficient for a criminal charge. Maintaining records of the court-ordered removal and promptly noting any unauthorized return to the property are practices consistent with enforcing rights under this provision.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Tenn. Code Ann. tit. 29, ch. 18 § 29-18-133 makes it a Class C misdemeanor for a person who has been legally dispossessed to return and retake possession of the same premises. Individuals who believe a dispossession action was improper or unlawful have legal avenues — such as appealing the underlying court order or raising procedural defenses — that are distinct from simply re-entering the property. Tenant-rights organizations and legal aid services in Tennessee can help individuals understand what options may exist to challenge a dispossession through proper legal channels rather than self-help re-entry.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated October 29, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 151.20
TEMPORARY EVICTION CONTROLS AND RENT REDUCTIONS FOR MOBILE HOMES DAMAGED IN THE JANUARY, 1994 EARTHQUAKE
§ 1
Definitions
§ 2
Eviction of tenants prohibited; exceptions