Wash. Admin. Code § 162-36 § 162-36-006
Retaliation.
Operative Text
It is an unlawful practice to coerce, intimidate, threaten or interfere with any person in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of, rights regarding real estate transactions, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim, contentions or allegations at issue.
Under Wash. Admin. Code § 162-36-001 et seq. § 162-36-006, it is an unlawful practice for anyone to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with a person because that person exercised, enjoyed, or helped others exercise rights related to real estate transactions. This protection applies regardless of whether the underlying fair-housing claim or allegation has been proven or is even meritorious. The rule is designed to ensure that people can assert or support real estate rights without fear of retaliation.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Property owners and managers operating under Wash. Admin. Code § 162-36-001 et seq. § 162-36-006 generally ensure that no adverse action—such as threats, intimidation, or interference—is taken against a tenant, applicant, or anyone who has exercised or supported fair-housing rights. Compliant operators train staff to avoid conduct that could be perceived as retaliatory, even when they believe the underlying complaint or allegation lacks merit. Maintaining clear, documented, and consistent policies helps demonstrate that any adverse action is based on legitimate, non-retaliatory grounds.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Wash. Admin. Code § 162-36-001 et seq. § 162-36-006 protects tenants and applicants from coercion, threats, or interference when they exercise or support rights related to real estate transactions—even if the underlying complaint has not been resolved in their favor. If a tenant believes a landlord has retaliated against them for asserting fair-housing rights, general enforcement paths include filing a complaint with the Washington State Human Rights Commission or consulting a tenant-rights organization familiar with state fair-housing law. Documenting any adverse actions and their timing relative to the exercise of rights can be relevant when pursuing these avenues.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated October 7, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
No outbound references recorded yet for this provision.
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.