Saint Paul, Minn., Legis. Code ch. 183 § 183.031

Employment exemptions

In Force
Verified 11/13/2026 · Next check 12/13/2026
Saint PaulFair Housing & Anti-Discrimination

Operative Text

Saint Paul, Minn., Legis. Code ch. 183 § 183.031
(a) The provisions of section 183.03 shall not apply to:
(1) The employment of any individual by his/her parent, grandparent, spouse, child or grandchild or in the domestic service of any person;
(2) A religious or fraternal corporation, association or society, with respect to qualifications based on religion, when religion shall be a bona fide occupational qualification for employment;
(3) The employment of one (1) person in place of another, standing by itself, shall not be evidence of an unfair discriminatory practice;
(4) An age restriction applied uniformly and without exception to all individuals established by a bona fide apprenticeship program pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 178, which limits participation to persons who enter the program prior to some specified age and the trade involved in the program predominantly consists of heavy physical labor or work on high structures;
(5) Neither shall the operation of a bona fide seniority system which mandates differences in such things as wages, hiring priorities, layoff priorities, vacation credit, and job assignments based on seniority be a violation of the age discrimination provisions of this chapter, so long as the operation of such system is not a subterfuge to evade the provisions of this chapter;
(6) With respect to age discrimination, a practice whereby a labor organization or employer offers or supplies varying insurance benefits or other fringe benefits to members or employees of differing ages, so long as the cost to the labor organization or employer for such benefits is reasonably equivalent for all members or employees;
(7) A restriction imposed by state statute, home rule charter, ordinance or civil service rule, and applied uniformly and without exception to all individuals, which established a maximum age for entry into employment as a peace officer or firefighter;
(8) By law or published retirement policy, a mandatory retirement age may be established without being a violation of this chapter if it is established consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Section 181.81. Nothing in this chapter nor in Minnesota Statutes, Section 181.81 shall prohibit employee pension retirement plans from granting pension credit to employees over the age of sixty-five (65) at a lesser rate than is granted to other employees; provided that in no event may an employee's accumulated pension credits be reduced by continued employment, and further provided that no other state or federal law is violated by the reduced rate of pension credit accrual. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit the establishment of differential privileges, benefits, services or facilities for persons of designated ages if:
a. Such differential treatment is provided pursuant to statute; or
b. The designated age is greater than fifty-nine (59) years or less than twenty-one (21).
Clause b. above does not apply to hiring, tenure, compensation, upgrading or conditions of employment.
(9) Nothing in this chapter concerning age discrimination shall be construed to validate or permit age requirements which have disproportionate impact on persons of any class otherwise protected by this chapter.
(b) It is not a violation of this chapter for an employer, employment agency or labor organization:
(1) To require or request a person to undergo physical examination, which may include a medical history, for the purpose of determining the person's capability to perform available employment, provided:
a. That an offer of employment has been made on condition that the person meets the physical and mental requirements of the job, except that a law enforcement agency filling a peace officer position may require or request an applicant to undergo psychological evaluation before a job offer is made, provided that the psychological evaluation is for those job-related abilities set forth by the board of peace officer standards and training for psychological evaluations and is otherwise lawful;
b. That the examination tests only for essential job-related abilities; and
c. That the examination, unless limited to determining whether the person's disability would prevent performance on the job, is required of all persons conditionally offered employment for the same position regardless of disability; or
(2) With the consent of the employee, after employment has commenced, to obtain additional medical information for the purposes of assessing continuing ability to perform the job and employee health insurance eligibility or for the purposes mandated by state or federal law;
(3) To administer pre-employment tests, provided that the tests measure only essentially job-related abilities; are required of all applicants for the same position regardless of disability unless limited to determining whether the person's disability would prevent performance on the job; and accurately measure the applicant's aptitude, achievement level, or whatever factors they purport to measure rather than reflecting the applicant's impairment of sensory, manual or speaking skills, except when those skills are the factors the tests purport to measure;
(4) To limit receipt of benefits payable under a fringe benefit plan for disabilities to that period of time which a licensed physician reasonably determines a person is unable to work; or
(5) To provide special safety considerations for pregnant women involved in tasks which are potentially hazardous to the health of the unborn child, as determined by medical criteria.
(c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit any program, service, facility or privilege afforded to a person with a disability which is intended to habilitate, rehabilitate or accommodate that person. It is a defense to a complaint brought under the employment provisions of this chapter that the person bringing the complaint or action has a disability which in the circumstances and even with reasonable accommodation, as defined in section 183.03 (7), poses a serious threat to the health or safety of the disabled person or others. The burden of proving this defense is upon the respondent.
Source: Legislative text reproduced verbatim
Plain English

Saint Paul Legislative Code ch. 183 § 183.031 carves out specific situations where the anti-discrimination employment rules of § 183.03 do not apply. These exemptions cover areas such as family-member employment, religious organizations hiring based on faith as a genuine job requirement, certain age-based apprenticeship and seniority systems, and lawful physical or pre-employment testing tied to essential job functions. The provision also clarifies that programs designed to accommodate or rehabilitate people with disabilities are not prohibited, and that a serious safety threat—even with reasonable accommodation—can serve as a defense against a disability-discrimination complaint.

Written by anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 · Reviewed on November 13, 2026

Plain English — not legal advice.

For Property Managers

While § 183.031 primarily governs employer and labor-organization conduct rather than landlord-tenant relationships, property owners who also act as employers—such as those hiring resident managers or maintenance staff—should be aware that certain practices are explicitly permitted under this section. Compliant operators generally ensure that any physical examinations, pre-employment tests, or benefit-plan structures they use are tied strictly to essential job-related functions and are applied uniformly across all applicants or employees in the same position. Operators relying on a seniority system or age-based apprenticeship program should confirm that those systems meet the specific criteria outlined in § 183.031 and are not used as a pretext to circumvent the chapter's broader anti-discrimination requirements.

General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.

For Tenants

Saint Paul Legislative Code ch. 183 § 183.031 defines the boundaries of the exemptions to the anti-discrimination protections in § 183.03, which means understanding these exemptions helps workers and applicants recognize when a practice may still be covered by the chapter's protections. If an employer's claimed exemption—such as a physical examination requirement or a seniority system—does not meet the specific conditions described in § 183.031, that practice may still constitute an unfair discriminatory practice under the broader chapter. Individuals who believe an exemption has been applied improperly can explore options such as filing a complaint with a relevant civil rights or human rights body, or consulting a tenant-rights or workers'-rights organization familiar with Saint Paul's local code.

General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.

Generated November 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.

Effective Timeline

Click on timeline segments to view historical versions.

References Out

Rules and statutes cited by this regulation

Minn. Stat. § 183.03
Not yet ingested

References In

No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.

Related Rules

§ 5.106
§ 5.106 Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender identity in community planning and development programs.
§ 5.109
§ 5.109 Equal participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs and activities.
§ 2
Policies; recommendations

Source Information