Saint Paul, Minn., Legis. Code ch. 183 § 183.202
Suits by private parties
Operative Text
(1) Time frame for action. A person may bring a civil action seeking redress for an unfair discriminatory practice directly to the district court wherein the unlawful discriminatory practice is alleged to have been committed or where the respondent resides or has a principal place of business. In addition, a person may bring civil action: (a) Within forty-five (45) days after receipt of notice that the director has dismissed a charge because it is frivolous or without merit, because: 1. The complainant has failed to provide required information; 2. The director has determined that further use of department resources is not warranted; or 3. The investigation of the charge has concluded in a no cause determination. (b) Within forty-five (45) days after receipt of notice that the director has reaffirmed a determination of no cause if the complainant requested a reconsideration of the no cause determination or has decided not to reopen a dismissed case that the complainant has asked to be reopened; or For the purposes of subsections 183.202 (1)(a) and (b) above, receipt of notice is presumed to be five (5) days from the date of service by mail of the written notice. (c) After forty-five (45) days from the filing of a charge pursuant to section 183.20 , if the director has not entered into a predetermination settlement agreement to which the complainant is a party. The complainant shall notify the director of an intention to bring a civil action, which shall be commenced within ninety (90) days of giving the notice. This forty-five (45) day period shall not apply to real property cases. (d) For cases involving an alleged violation of section 183.06 , the aggrieved person may file in court up to two (2) years after the occurrence or termination of an alleged discriminatory housing practice or the breach of a conciliation agreement, whichever occurs later. The statute of limitations in these qualifying cases is tolled during the investigation. (2) Mixed findings. If the director has issued both a cause and a no cause determination on separate issues in the same charge, the complainant may, if a hearing is held, require that all matters be heard at the hearing or may bring a civil action for the no cause charge(s) at the same time as the cause charge(s) under the rules and time frames that govern the cause charges. (3) Proper notice by complainant. A complainant bringing a civil action shall mail a copy of the summons and complaint, by registered or certified mail to the director and upon their receipt the director shall terminate all proceedings in the department relating to the charge upon commencement of the civil action. No charge shall be filed or reinstituted with the director after a civil action relating to the same unfair discriminatory practice has been dismissed without prejudice. (4) Intervention in civil actions. In cases alleging a violation of section 183.06 , the following rights of intervention are available: (a) any aggrieved person has the opportunity to intervene as of right when one of the parties in an administrative proceeding elects to resolve the matter via a civil action; (b) The director may intervene in a private civil action after certifying the case is of general public importance; and (c) An aggrieved person or a party to a conciliation agreement may intervene in a civil action commenced by the director. (5) Relief which may be granted. (a) In actions brought pursuant to section 183.202 , if the court finds that a violation has occurred or is about to occur, the court may award to the plaintiff actual and punitive damages and, subject to subsection 183.202 (5)(b), may grant as relief, as the court deems appropriate, any permanent or temporary injunction, temporary restraining order, or other order (including an order enjoining the defendant from engaging in such practice or ordering such affirmative action as may be appropriate). (b) Relief granted under this section shall not affect any contract, sale, encumbrance, or lease consummated before the granting of such relief and involving a bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer, or tenant, without actual notice of the filing of a verified charge or civil action under this chapter.
Saint Paul Legislative Code ch. 183 § 183.202 establishes the rules under which a person who believes they have experienced unlawful housing discrimination may file a civil lawsuit directly in district court, independent of or alongside an administrative complaint process. The provision sets out specific time windows—ranging from 45 to 90 days depending on the stage of the administrative process, and up to two years for certain housing discrimination cases under section 183.06—within which a civil action must be initiated. Courts that find a violation may award actual and punitive damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief, though such relief generally does not unwind transactions completed by bona fide parties before they had notice of the charge or lawsuit.
Plain English — not legal advice.
Under Saint Paul Legislative Code ch. 183 § 183.202, property owners and managers should be aware that a complainant who has filed a discrimination charge may elect to bypass or exit the administrative process and pursue a civil lawsuit in district court. Operators who receive a summons and complaint in such an action should note that the director of the relevant department is required to terminate administrative proceedings upon receiving proper notice of the civil action. Compliant operators generally maintain thorough records of all transactions and communications related to fair housing matters, as courts under § 183.202 have authority to award both actual and punitive damages if a violation is found.
General guidance for property managers — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult an attorney for advice on your case.
Saint Paul Legislative Code ch. 183 § 183.202 gives individuals who believe they have experienced unlawful housing discrimination the right to bring a civil action in district court, with deadlines that vary based on where the administrative process stands—for example, 45 days after certain dismissal notices, or up to two years for housing discrimination claims under section 183.06. Tenants who have filed an administrative charge and wish to pursue a civil action are generally required to notify the director before filing, and should be aware that doing so triggers the termination of related administrative proceedings. Those navigating these timelines may benefit from consulting a tenant-rights organization or legal aid provider familiar with § 183.202 to understand which procedural path applies to their circumstances.
General guidance for tenants — not legal advice for your specific situation. Consult a tenant-rights organization or attorney for advice on your case.
Generated November 13, 2026 — auto-generated, not yet human-reviewed. See /transparency for methodology.
Effective Timeline
References Out
Rules and statutes cited by this regulation
References In
No inbound references recorded yet for this provision.
Related Rules
Source Information
Use this in your app
Access this data programmatically via our API